For clinical research studies directed at evaluating the safety and/or effectiveness of an unapproved device, the prior submission of an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) is required if the reviewing institutional review board (IRB) determines that the device, or its proposed use in the research study, constitutes a "significant risk" to the research subjects.
For clinical research studies directed at evaluating the safety and/or effectiveness of an unapproved device, the prior submission of an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) is required if the reviewing institutional review board (IRB) determines that the device, or its proposed use in the research study, constitutes a "significant risk" to the research subjects.
A significant risk device is an investigational device that: (1) is intended as an implant and presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject; (2) is for use in supporting or sustaining human life and represents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject; (3) is for a use of substantial importance in diagnosing, curing, mitigating, or treating disease or otherwise preventing impairment of human health and presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject; or (4) otherwise presents a potential for serious risk to a subject.
A "non-significant risk device study" is a study of a device that does not meet the FDA's definition for a "significant risk device study."
If a device is found to be a Non-Significant Risk device (NSR), an IDE application to the FDA for their approval is NOT required. A nonsignificant risk device study requires only IRB approval prior to initiation of a clinical study. Federal regulations still apply to a non-significant risk investigation [812.2(b)], but the IRB assumes responsibility for oversight of the study. This is called an "abbreviated IDE". Submissions for nonsignificant device investigations are made directly to the IRB of each participating institution. Sponsors should present an explanation to the IRB where the study will occur of why the device does not pose a significant risk. If the IRB disagrees and determines that the device poses a significant risk, the sponsor must report this finding to FDA within five working days [812.150(b)(9)]. FDA considers an investigation of a nonsignificant risk device to have an approved IDE when IRB concurs with the nonsignificant risk determination and approves the study.
For Devices NOT Currently Approved for General Marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA):
For Devices NOT Currently Approved for General Marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA):
Exceptions to the general requirements for an IDE submission
For Devices Currently Approved for General Marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): For clinical research studies directed at evaluating the safety and/or effectiveness of an approved device for an indication that does not appear currently in the FDA-approved product labeling (i.e., an "off-label" indication), the prior submission of an IDE is required if the reviewing IRB determines that the device, or its proposed use in the research study, constitutes a "significant risk" to the research subjects.
Devices Currently Approved for General Marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Exception to the general requirements for an IDE submission.
If you would like to receive guidance in determining if an IDE is needed for your research study or to determine if your study is exempt from the requirement for an IDE submission, please contact the Clinical Research Compliance Office at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
For additional help, download a detailed IDE submission template with instructions and visit ReGARDD.org, a website focused on providing academic researchers with the regulatory tools and resources necessary to successfully navigate the pathway from discovery to clinical implementation of new drugs, biologics, and medical devices.
The Investigational Device "life cycle" can be complicated. It's a good idea to plan pre-clinical and clinical studies well in advance of actual FDA submission to avoid unnecessary roadblocks.
The FDA's Center for Device and Radiological Health (CDRH) has developed several learning modules with regard to medical device regulations. These modules are intended as an interactive and accessible tool for those involved in medical device manufacturing and research.
Brinkhous-Bullitt, 2nd floor
160 N. Medical Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
919.966.6022
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
© 2008-2024
The North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NC TraCS) Institute at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The content of this website is solely the responsibility of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH accessibility | contact